About · EU-trained lawyer · Based in NYC

An EU-trained lawyer, now based in New York, advising on the EU AI Act.

The EU AI Act was written in Brussels, not in Manhattan. Most NYC advisors translate it from the outside in. I was trained in two EU jurisdictions, spent close to a decade practicing EU regulatory law, and now advise NYC companies from within the US market. That dual position is not a coincidence — it is the reason this practice exists.

Background

Why an EU-trained lawyer in NYC is the right fit for the EU AI Act

I studied law in Romania and Spain, qualified with the Spanish Bar (Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Santa Cruz de Tenerife, nº 5961), and spent close to ten years practicing EU regulatory law — with deep work in data protection, immigration and administrative procedure, and more recently AI governance. My training is native to the European regulatory mindset: how a Regulation is structured, how the text is read, which recitals carry interpretive weight, which national authorities set precedent, how enforcement actually moves through member-state markets.

From New York, I now advise companies whose AI systems touch European users, employees, or operations. The advantage is structural. An advisor who learned EU law by reading summaries written for a US audience is translating twice — once from the Regulation to summary, once from summary to the client. I translate once, directly from primary sources, in the professional register they were drafted in.

In practice, this means: Annex IV documentation drafted to the specification that EU market surveillance authorities will actually inspect; Article 9 risk management systems designed around how European regulators think about risk, not around how US compliance teams typically structure risk frameworks; Article 2 scope assessments that do not under-count the extraterritorial reach.

What this practice does

Scope of engagement

euaiactnyc is operated by Lexara Advisory LLC, a Wyoming AI governance consulting firm. Engagements cover:

  • Article 2 territorial scope assessments for NYC companies with potential EU exposure
  • Annex III high-risk classification analysis and documentation
  • Article 11 and Annex IV technical documentation drafting
  • Article 9 risk management system design and maintenance
  • Article 10 data governance documentation
  • Article 13 instructions-for-use and Article 14 human oversight design
  • Article 4 AI literacy programmes for deploying organisations
  • Article 49 registration preparation where applicable
  • Dual compliance coordination for AEDTs subject to NYC Local Law 144
  • Article 50 transparency obligations (AI system disclosure, synthetic content marking)
  • Coordination with external bias auditors for LL144 compliance

Where a matter requires US legal representation — a DCWP investigation, an EEOC charge, litigation — clients engage qualified US counsel and I coordinate as the EU AI Act technical lead. This is how global compliance matters are staffed at serious firms: the right person for the European regulation alongside the right person for the US proceeding.

Credentials

Founder

Constantin Răzvan Gospodin Florea is a Spanish-barred lawyer (Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Santa Cruz de Tenerife, nº 5961) with legal training in two EU member states and approximately a decade of practice experience in EU regulatory law. He is an IAPP AIGP candidate, author of the Guilty Algorithm blog-as-book on AI regulation in criminal justice and immigration law, and founder of Lexara Advisory LLC.

Spanish Bar · ICATF 5961 EU legal training · Romania & Spain ~10 yrs EU regulatory practice IAPP AIGP candidate Based in New York City

Contact

Consulting inquiries: advisory@lexaraadvisory.com. Phone: +1 (646) 381-2032.

Engagement runs through Lexara Advisory LLC. See lexaraadvisory.com for the parent entity and broader service catalog.