Verified against Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, NYC Admin Code and primary guidance from the AI Office. Where regulation is settled we say so. Where it is evolving, such as harmonised standards, we mark it.
By Constantin Răzvan Gospodin Florea · Spanish-barred lawyer (ICATF nº 5961) · Lexara Advisory LLC · About
Article 2 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 reaches NYC companies with European users, employees, or operations. Three extraterritorial triggers with factual tests that resolve scope.
Read → Pillar · Dual compliance roadmapThe practical steps to align an AEDT with both NYC Local Law 144 and the EU AI Act. Integrated workstream across LL144 audit and Annex III documentation, now adjusted for the Digital Omnibus fixed deadlines.
Read → Note · AI literacyArticle 4 entered force February 2025. The Digital Omnibus proposes to transform it from a direct obligation on providers and deployers into a duty on Member States and the Commission to foster AI literacy — what that means for NYC HR teams today.
Read → Note · GPAIChapter V of the EU AI Act covers general-purpose AI models. What a NYC company using GPT-class models via API has to document, with the updated AI Office supervision architecture under the Digital Omnibus.
Read → Note · NY State layerNew York State enacted the RAISE Act for frontier AI models — effective January 2027. How this state layer interacts with EU AI Act exposure for NYC companies.
Read → Update · Q2 2026Where the EU AI Act stands mid-April 2026 — Digital Omnibus trilogue, AI Office Service Desk, harmonised standards progress, and what NYC companies should prioritize before Council-Parliament agreement.
Read → Pillar · Digital OmnibusCOM(2025) 836 proposes fixed delays to high-risk rules (2 December 2027 for Annex III), a new nudifier prohibition under Article 5, Article 4 AI literacy reform, and centralised AI Office supervision. Trilogue ongoing.
Read → Note · Official resourcesThe authoritative resources maintained by the European Commission AI Office and the AI Board: Single Information Platform, Explorer, Compliance Checker, and the official guidelines under preparation for 2026.
Read → Pillar · Penalties & finesArticle 99 explained with NYC scenarios — three penalty tiers, SME and small mid-cap reductions under the Digital Omnibus, and why turnover calculation matters more than most advisors admit.
Read → Pillar · Prohibited practicesArticle 5 entered into force February 2025 and has been enforceable since August 2025. The eight current categories plus the proposed nudifier ban, with real cases and NYC industry exposure.
Read → Pillar · Annex IIIAnnex III lists 8 categories of high-risk AI systems. Which ones NYC companies most commonly deploy, Article 6(3) exceptions, and when the obligations actually apply after the Digital Omnibus.
Read → Note · Authorised representativeArticle 22 requires US providers of high-risk AI to appoint an EU authorised representative before market placement. What it does, who can serve, typical arrangements for NYC providers.
Read → Pillar · GDPR interplayThe AI Act applies without prejudice to the GDPR. How they interact for NYC deployers, DPIA vs FRIA, and the Omnibus expansion of the legal basis for processing special categories for bias detection.
Read → Tool · Self-assessmentStructured self-assessment walking NYC companies through Article 2 territorial scope, Article 3 roles, and Annex III classification. If you need formal verification, Lexara Advisory runs free assessments.
Read →No posts in this category yet.
Lexara Advisory runs a free EU AI Act readiness assessment for NYC companies — structured, confidential, delivered as a written memo. No commitment, no generic checklist.
Request free assessmentEU AI Act guidance